https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100897
--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Leonard von Merzljak from comment #2)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #1)
> Thank you for your comment. I tried it out and can confirm that I don't get
> a stack-overflow anymore if I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100897
--- Comment #2 from Leonard von Merzljak ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #1)
> for symmetric transfer to work without stack overflow, it relies on an
> indirect tailcall.
>
> For some GCC targets indirect tail-calls are not available
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100897
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
