[Bug c++/104111] Concept evaluation depends on context where it was first checked

2022-05-27 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104111 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #5) > An alternative fix for this bug would be to include the evaluation context > in the satisfaction cache. ...if the evaluation involved access checking of a

[Bug c++/104111] Concept evaluation depends on context where it was first checked

2022-05-27 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104111 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||67491 --- Comment #5 from Jason

[Bug c++/104111] Concept evaluation depends on context where it was first checked

2022-04-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104111 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|11.3|11.4 --- Comment #4 from Richard

[Bug c++/104111] Concept evaluation depends on context where it was first checked

2022-01-21 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104111 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/104111] Concept evaluation depends on context where it was first checked

2022-01-19 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104111 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/104111] Concept evaluation depends on context where it was first checked

2022-01-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104111 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/104111] Concept evaluation depends on context where it was first checked

2022-01-19 Thread fchelnokov at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104111 --- Comment #1 from Fedor Chelnokov --- Sorry, related discussion: https://stackoverflow.com/q/53263299/7325599