https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104184
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104184
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104184
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5)
> Started with r11-291-g0f50f6daa140186a.
Which does make it look so much related to PR 103057.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104184
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] ICE |[11/12 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104184
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse ---
https://geometrica.saclay.inria.fr/team/Marc.Glisse/tmp/mybug.cc.xz
(1.7M after compression still exceeds the limit)
With -Wall -Wextra
Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered.
0xec0348
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104184
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse ---
comment #1 actually reduces to
struct voider {
using type = void;
};
template struct rename : P {};
template using ignore = voider;
template typename ignore::type>::type g(T a) {}
void f() { g(1); }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104184
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104184
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
And the stack trace for comment #1
Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered.
0xff6b0d tsubst(tree_node*, tree_node*, int, tree_node*)
../../src/gcc/cp/pt.cc:16068
0xff5f6d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104184
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
A different reduction from the same code. This one does not compile with clang
anymore. ICEs with -Wall -W, but not if I remove one of them.
using mp_false = struct mp_identity { using type = void; };
