[Bug c++/104539] Failed to inline a very simple template function when it's explicit instantiated.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104539 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||programmerjake at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/104539] Failed to inline a very simple template function when it's explicit instantiated.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104539 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|12.0| Known to work|

[Bug c++/104539] Failed to inline a very simple template function when it's explicit instantiated.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104539 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2c9b7077b72529fbbe896212a0088bff6025c5e7 commit r12-7288-g2c9b7077b72529fbbe896212a0088bff6025c5e7 Author: Jason Merrill Date:

[Bug c++/104539] Failed to inline a very simple template function when it's explicit instantiated.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104539 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/104539] Failed to inline a very simple template function when it's explicit instantiated.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104539 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > the explicit instantiation lacks COMDAT (but has comdat_group) and it > has forced_by_abi. > > I'm not sure the C++ standard calls out any semantic difference

[Bug c++/104539] Failed to inline a very simple template function when it's explicit instantiated.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104539 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Last