[Bug c++/105756] [12 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_constant_expression at cp/constexpr.cc:7586: unexpected expression ‘ElemSize’ of kind template_parm_index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105756 --- Comment #7 from Sam James --- Thanks a bunch. Unfortunately the original issue (not the reduced one) still fails, but I've filed bug 105931 for that.

[Bug c++/105756] [12 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_constant_expression at cp/constexpr.cc:7586: unexpected expression ‘ElemSize’ of kind template_parm_index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105756 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/105756] [12 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_constant_expression at cp/constexpr.cc:7586: unexpected expression ‘ElemSize’ of kind template_parm_index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105756 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:47ea22015c90df31eae763c6c9e3e4b1fb801c3a commit r12-8472-g47ea22015c90df31eae763c6c9e3e4b1fb801c3a Author: Patrick Palka

[Bug c++/105756] [12 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_constant_expression at cp/constexpr.cc:7586: unexpected expression ‘ElemSize’ of kind template_parm_index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105756 --- Comment #4 from Sam James --- Thanks! Could you consider backporting to 12.x soonish, if possible? I ask because with this, the 12.x branch is then in a pretty good state for more widespread testing. (Unfortunately, I got a bit unlucky and