[Bug c++/106921] [11/12/13 Regression] -O1 and -fipa-icf -fpartial-inlining causes wrong code since r11-4987-g602c6cfc79ce4ae6

2022-12-28 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106921 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/106921] [11/12/13 Regression] -O1 and -fipa-icf -fpartial-inlining causes wrong code since r11-4987-g602c6cfc79ce4ae6

2022-10-18 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106921 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.4 Priority|P3

[Bug c++/106921] [11/12/13 Regression] -O1 and -fipa-icf -fpartial-inlining causes wrong code since r11-4987-g602c6cfc79ce4ae6

2022-09-26 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106921 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- Will take a look in next weeks.

[Bug c++/106921] [11/12/13 Regression] -O1 and -fipa-icf -fpartial-inlining causes wrong code since r11-4987-g602c6cfc79ce4ae6

2022-09-25 Thread lutztonineubert at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106921 --- Comment #3 from Toni Neubert --- Any update on this? Which compiler flag triggers this bug exactly? Or is it a complex combination multiple?

[Bug c++/106921] [11/12/13 Regression] -O1 and -fipa-icf -fpartial-inlining causes wrong code since r11-4987-g602c6cfc79ce4ae6

2022-09-13 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106921 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | CC|