[Bug c++/109247] [13/14 Regression] optional o; o = {x}; wants to use explicit optional(U) constructor since r13-6765-ga226590fefb35ed6

2024-03-09 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109247 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/109247] [13/14 Regression] optional o; o = {x}; wants to use explicit optional(U) constructor since r13-6765-ga226590fefb35ed6

2023-07-27 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109247 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.2|13.3 --- Comment #19 from Richard

[Bug c++/109247] [13/14 Regression] optional o; o = {x}; wants to use explicit optional(U) constructor since r13-6765-ga226590fefb35ed6

2023-06-23 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109247 --- Comment #18 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dc7f1bfbe5999e4639cf3f3afe70043b49352fdf commit r13-7470-gdc7f1bfbe5999e4639cf3f3afe70043b49352fdf Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug c++/109247] [13/14 Regression] optional o; o = {x}; wants to use explicit optional(U) constructor since r13-6765-ga226590fefb35ed6

2023-06-02 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109247 --- Comment #17 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9872d56661ade358c440914361c1ebdccd975bec commit r14-1502-g9872d56661ade358c440914361c1ebdccd975bec Author: Jason Merrill Date:

[Bug c++/109247] [13/14 Regression] optional o; o = {x}; wants to use explicit optional(U) constructor since r13-6765-ga226590fefb35ed6

2023-05-31 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109247 --- Comment #16 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #15) > Discussion in CWG led to this more specific rule that only affects the > copy/move special member functions, and so doesn't affect the 84849 > testcases:

[Bug c++/109247] [13/14 Regression] optional o; o = {x}; wants to use explicit optional(U) constructor since r13-6765-ga226590fefb35ed6

2023-05-31 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109247 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #54739|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/109247] [13/14 Regression] optional o; o = {x}; wants to use explicit optional(U) constructor since r13-6765-ga226590fefb35ed6

2023-05-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109247 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||enolan at alumni dot cmu.edu ---

[Bug c++/109247] [13/14 Regression] optional o; o = {x}; wants to use explicit optional(U) constructor since r13-6765-ga226590fefb35ed6

2023-05-17 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109247 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vincent.lebourlot@starqube.

[Bug c++/109247] [13/14 Regression] optional o; o = {x}; wants to use explicit optional(U) constructor since r13-6765-ga226590fefb35ed6

2023-04-28 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109247 --- Comment #12 from Marek Polacek --- I suppose we should add a porting_to.html note about this (in light of Bug 109663).

[Bug c++/109247] [13/14 Regression] optional o; o = {x}; wants to use explicit optional(U) constructor since r13-6765-ga226590fefb35ed6

2023-04-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109247 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||carlosgalvezp at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/109247] [13/14 Regression] optional o; o = {x}; wants to use explicit optional(U) constructor since r13-6765-ga226590fefb35ed6

2023-04-26 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109247 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.0|13.2 --- Comment #10 from Richard