https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109291
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to ncm from comment #2)
> CWG 1430 is still marked Open, and is anyway only superficially
> analogous. Here, there is no need for an alias to be encoded
> into a type signature.
Right and yes PR 5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109291
--- Comment #2 from ncm at cantrip dot org ---
CWG 1430 is still marked Open, and is anyway only superficially
analogous. Here, there is no need for an alias to be encoded
into a type signature.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109291
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
