https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109464
--- Comment #5 from LIU Hao ---
Additional information:
I tried splitting the two class templates into two separate .cpp files, so the
explicit instantiation of `basic_shallow_string` should not be subject to
the instantiation of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109464
LIU Hao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.4.0, 9.5.0
--- Comment #4 from LIU Hao
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109464
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to LIU Hao from comment #2)
> shouldn't this be classified as wrong code?
It is at least a link-failure. Wrong code might be a strech here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109464
--- Comment #2 from LIU Hao ---
shouldn't this be classified as wrong code?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109464
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 54825
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54825=edit
failed attempt at reducing
This was my trial on reducing the testcase but it failed. In that the symbol is
defined
