https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114600
--- Comment #15 from m.cencora at gmail dot com ---
Thanks!
Unfortunately it seems that your changes broke reexporting of types declared in
other module. It works fine on gcc-14.
$ cat base.cpp
module;
#include
export module base;
export
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114600
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114600
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114600
--- Comment #12 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to m.cencora from comment #10)
> Created attachment 57924 [details]
> Full "std' modules with workarounds
>
> Here is an improved version of "std" module, with workarounds for:
> https://gcc.gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114600
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3878e9aeb30cb192f769997c52743daf8190744c
commit r14-9961-g3878e9aeb30cb192f769997c52743daf8190744c
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114600
m.cencora at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #57921|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114600
--- Comment #9 from m.cencora at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8)
> Thanks. I hope we'll end up auto-generating a file like that from
> ../gcc/cp/cxxapi-data.csv
Hmm, then that file will have to be extended because
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114600
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Thanks. I hope we'll end up auto-generating a file like that from
../gcc/cp/cxxapi-data.csv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114600
--- Comment #7 from m.cencora at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 57921
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57921&action=edit
Full "std" module
FYI if you want to stress test the modules impl w.r.t. similar issues, here is
s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114600
--- Comment #6 from Nathaniel Shead ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #5)
> (In reply to Nathaniel Shead from comment #4)
> > I'm not yet sure exactly why my patch caused this to start failing though;
> > it sounds like it's exporting
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114600
--- Comment #5 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Nathaniel Shead from comment #4)
> In general we don't yet implement merging of textual redefinitions; I guess
> this ultimately falls under that, but I'm not sure we have a dedicated bug
> repo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114600
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114600
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114600
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nshead at gcc dot gnu.org,
14 matches
Mail list logo
