https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114888
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114888
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c925ac349b03ae9439c632fb1c042cdc8d78f40
commit r14-10149-g3c925ac349b03ae9439c632fb1c042cdc8d78f40
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114888
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3900e944b0ac9db77380c5bb8635977dfd3b0691
commit r15-56-g3900e944b0ac9db77380c5bb8635977dfd3b0691
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114888
--- Comment #6 from Patrick Palka ---
Yeah I think the TREE_TYPE of a compound type should never be null, at least as
far as type dependence is concerned.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114888
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Though, I think both build_pointer_type and build_reference_type would segfault
if it was called on NULL_TREE to_type, and I don't see any spot in the FE that
would create pointer/reference types without
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114888
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #3)
> Seems we're missing a dependence check in the sizeof / sizeof code:
>
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/typeck.cc b/gcc/cp/typeck.cc
> index e5a52dc2b39..284f6e29e36
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114888
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 Regression] ICE when|[14/15 Regression] ICE when
