[Bug c++/16030] [3.4 Regression] [cygwin/mingw]: stdcall function decoration vs LTHUNK alias in multiple inheritanc

2006-02-28 Thread gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #15 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-28 09:28 --- Fixed in 4.0 and up. -- gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/16030] [3.4 Regression] [cygwin/mingw]: stdcall function decoration vs LTHUNK alias in multiple inheritanc

2005-10-06 Thread gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-07 03:23 --- Not a high priority as per maintainer. Postponed to 3.4.6 era -- gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/16030] [3.4 Regression] [cygwin/mingw]: stdcall function decoration vs LTHUNK alias in multiple inheritanc

2005-05-19 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|3.4.4 |3.4.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16030

[Bug c++/16030] [3.4 Regression] [cygwin/mingw]: stdcall function decoration vs LTHUNK alias in multiple inheritanc

2004-10-30 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-31 02:01 --- Postponed until GCC 3.4.4. Although it's somewhat sad the patch has not yet been applied, given that I approved it in August. It's still OK to apply the patch, before 3.4.3, if somebody wants to do

[Bug c++/16030] [3.4 Regression] [cygwin/mingw]: stdcall function decoration vs LTHUNK alias in multiple inheritanc

2004-10-30 Thread giovannibajo at libero dot it
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-10-31 02:05 --- Danny, can you please quickly retest the patch and apply it immediatly to the branch? We might be still in time for 3.4.3. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16030

[Bug c++/16030] [3.4 Regression] [cygwin/mingw]: stdcall function decoration vs LTHUNK alias in multiple inheritanc

2004-10-30 Thread dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Additional Comments From dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net 2004-10-31 02:37 --- No, I won't backport this patch. Although the patch did apply cleanly and fixed this bug, using change_decl_assembler name caused warnings with mingw (in my code base, not in testsuite)