https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16166
--- Comment #14 from Eric Gallager ---
This came up on the gcc-help mailing list here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2018-11/msg3.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16166
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16166
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Created attachment 43443
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43443=edit
Patch to split -Weffc++ into separate options.
This adds several new warning options to replace -Weffc++, and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16166
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16166
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 63871 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16166
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
# Item 11: Define a copy constructor and an assignment operator for classes
with
dynamically allocated memory.
Replaced by Item
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16166
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-29
08:34:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
* Item 11: Define a copy constructor and an assignment operator for classes
with dynamically allocated memory.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16166
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16166
--- Comment #7 from David Stone david at doublewise dot net 2012-05-29
20:57:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #4)
* Item 11: Define a copy constructor and an assignment operator for classes
with dynamically allocated
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16166
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-29
23:21:23 UTC ---
I would keep the patches separate.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16166
--- Comment #4 from David Stone david at doublewise dot net 2012-05-29
02:13:53 UTC ---
I would recommend against naming each warning -Weffc++[n], but rather, give a
more descriptive name. My suggestion is to create a few warnings, so that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16166
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07
16:10:10 UTC ---
Reviewing these warnings w.r.t the much improved third edition...
(In reply to comment #1)
# Item 11: Define a copy constructor and an assignment operator
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Last reconfirmed|2004-10-30 17:49:38 |2005-01-29 03:19:30
date|
13 matches
Mail list logo
