--- Comment #13 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:25
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from titusjan at gmail dot com 2006-02-17 08:38 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
Is this still an issue in 4.1/4.2. IIUC I've cleaned up the points where this
warning was/was not being emitted.
Ah. I've got 4.0.3. I'll check 4.1/4.2.
--
--- Comment #11 from nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-16 20:12 ---
Is this still an issue in 4.1/4.2. IIUC I've cleaned up the points where this
warning was/was not being emitted.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17519
--- Comment #10 from titusjan at gmail dot com 2006-02-15 11:53 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #4)
[snip]
All the more reason to warn if we don't pack these members now, but we might
fix that in the future and thus change the data layout.
I.e. if the packed
--- Comment #9 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-10 18:22 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
There's certainly a good case for warning about packing that's likely not to
have the desired results - we've been bitten by that before. But that doesn't
really apply to all non-POD; you
