--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-07
15:47 ---
*** Bug 18873 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-07
15:49 ---
Note there is a patch to fix splay_tree_delete in PR 18602.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-07 16:17
---
Any reason why that patch hasn't been applied?
Just verified it works and on the testcase in PR 18873 it is even tiny
bit faster than the recursive variant.
Though splay_tree_splay_helper is recursive too, so
--
Bug 18462 depends on bug 18602, which changed state.
Bug 18602 Summary: segfault on a huge switch statement.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18602
What|Old Value |New Value
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-05
04:01 ---
: Search converges between 2003-12-18-trunk (#431) and 2003-12-24-trunk (#432).
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-13
16:45 ---
Either this is a dup of PR 16681 or there is another bug. The splay_tree is
very long which causes the
stack to be overflowed. Maybe we should fix the recursive nature of
splay_tree_delete.
--
