--- Comment #12 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-06 19:53
---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 21308 ***
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.4.5 |3.4.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18462
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-07-26
16:39 ---
The testcase in PR18602 does not cause a segfault anymore for GCC 3.4 CVS. Is
this bug fixed then? Or do we need a new testcase?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18462
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-19
18:35 ---
*** Bug 22562 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.4.4 |3.4.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18462
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-01
02:10 ---
Both this and PR 21308 are caused by:
2002-09-30 Mark Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* class.c (walk_subobject_offsets): Correct the calculation of
offsets for virtual bases. Correct the
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-01
02:28 ---
Oh, this is reproducable in 3.3.3 with -fabi-version=2.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18462
--
Bug 18462 depends on bug 16681, which changed state.
Bug 16681 Summary: [3.3/3.4 regression] array initialization in struct
construct is a memory hog
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16681
What|Old Value |New Value
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-07
21:32 ---
Fixed on the mainline by the patch which fixed 18602.
--
What|Removed |Added
Known to
--- Additional Comments From peturr02 at ru dot is 2004-11-13 16:26 ---
Created an attachment (id=7539)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7539action=view)
Preprocessed source code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18462
10 matches
Mail list logo