--- Additional Comments From kent at sas dot com 2005-02-14 15:03 ---
got it now, thanks, and sorry for the interuption. i've made some good progress
over the weekend on getting this to compile - i appreciate you getting me over
the hurdle. paul.
--
--- Additional Comments From kent at sas dot com 2005-02-12 03:50 ---
sorry, next time i'll add a.cpp as an attachment. still getting the hang of
this.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-12
05:59 ---
are sure that this is valid c++?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19919
--- Additional Comments From kent at sas dot com 2005-02-12 15:37 ---
i'm personally not sure; there is a test harness in the vulcan tree that i'll
extract and submit as an attachment.
the code in question has compiled and run on at least MSVC7, sun forte as well
as GCC 3.2.x; so in
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-12
22:22 ---
This code is invalid and here is why:
BePlusTree::ItemList is a dependent name so it needs a typenam keyword in front
of it to say that this
name is a type.
--
What|Removed
