[Bug c++/19989] [4.0/4.1 regression] Inconsistency with zero-sized arrays

2005-11-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-04 04:51 --- Fixed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug c++/19989] [4.0/4.1 regression] Inconsistency with zero-sized arrays

2005-11-03 Thread jconner at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from jconner at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-04 01:55 --- Subject: Bug 19989 Author: jconner Date: Fri Nov 4 01:55:36 2005 New Revision: 106471 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106471 Log: PR c++/19989 cp/pt.c (tsubst): Accept zero-length array if

[Bug c++/19989] [4.0/4.1 regression] Inconsistency with zero-sized arrays

2005-11-03 Thread jconner at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from jconner at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-04 01:23 --- Subject: Bug 19989 Author: jconner Date: Fri Nov 4 01:23:22 2005 New Revision: 106468 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106468 Log: PR c++/19989 cp/pt.c (tsubst): Accept zero-length array if tf

[Bug c++/19989] [4.0/4.1 regression] Inconsistency with zero-sized arrays

2005-11-02 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-03 07:06 --- I approved the patch. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19989

[Bug c++/19989] [4.0/4.1 regression] Inconsistency with zero-sized arrays

2005-11-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-03 01:18 --- And the changelog in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-11/msg00165.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19989

[Bug c++/19989] [4.0/4.1 regression] Inconsistency with zero-sized arrays

2005-11-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-03 01:18 --- Patch posted: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-11/msg00164.html -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c++/19989] [4.0/4.1 regression] Inconsistency with zero-sized arrays

2005-10-30 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 02:43 --- There's an easy fix outlined in Comment #4; we should implement it. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19989

[Bug c++/19989] [4.0/4.1 regression] Inconsistency with zero-sized arrays

2005-10-27 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |minor http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19989

[Bug c++/19989] [4.0/4.1 regression] Inconsistency with zero-sized arrays

2005-10-17 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-18 06:28 --- We all agree that in pedantic mode all three lines are erroneous, so let's just consider the non-pedantic case. We can choose not to be picky about the non-dependent declarations because such code makes the prog

[Bug c++/19989] [4.0/4.1 regression] Inconsistency with zero-sized arrays

2005-10-10 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-10 16:31 --- On the 3.4 branch the situation changed with Giovanni's patch for PR19208: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-07/msg00902.html We now diagnose none of the arrays without "-pedantic", and all three arrays with "-pe