http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20420
--- Comment #9 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-23 09:44:12 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Aug 23 09:44:08 2012
New Revision: 190618
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190618
Log:
/cp
2012-08-23
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20420
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20420
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20420
--- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-08-22
00:01:27 UTC ---
For Comment #4: the validate_nonmember_using_decl call at the beginning of
do_local_using_decl returns NULL_TREE for the second using declaration, but
--- Comment #6 from andrew dot stubbs at st dot com 2006-09-12 07:44
---
Subject: Re: Incorrectly Accepts double declarations
bangerth at dealii dot org wrote:
No, that code is definitely legal and unobjectionable. Just as having two
extern declarations of the same variable in the
--- Comment #4 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-11 21:45 ---
I suppose this is the same basic problem?
namespace N
{
int i;
}
void
f ()
{
using N::i;
using N::i;
}
--
amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2006-09-12 04:00 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
I suppose this is the same basic problem?
No, that code is definitely legal and unobjectionable. Just as having two
extern declarations of the same variable in the same scope (or two forward
--- Comment #3 from lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-22 13:58
---
Won't work on it for a long while.
--
lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-12
06:18 ---
It's xref_tag/push_tag bug.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc
