[Bug c++/20453] GCC fails to treat a valid constant expression as a template argument

2005-03-14 Thread joaquin at tid dot es
--- Additional Comments From joaquin at tid dot es 2005-03-14 17:08 --- (In reply to comment #4) (In reply to comment #3) (In reply to comment #2) I cannot reproduce it either with an obvious change to fix the missing Too bad. Sorry for reporting this in such an imprecise

[Bug c++/20453] GCC fails to treat a valid constant expression as a template argument

2005-03-13 Thread falk at debian dot org
--- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org 2005-03-13 13:42 --- (In reply to comment #0) I am sorry I can't provide a verified to fail snippet, since I don't have access to that version of GCC. The following is an untested attempt to reproduce the problem in isolated code.

[Bug c++/20453] GCC fails to treat a valid constant expression as a template argument

2005-03-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-13 14:30 --- I cannot reproduce it either with an obvious change to fix the missing : #include cstddef template std::size_t size_ , std::size_t alignment_ = std::size_t(-1) class aligned_storage { }; int

[Bug c++/20453] GCC fails to treat a valid constant expression as a template argument

2005-03-13 Thread joaquin at tid dot es
--- Additional Comments From joaquin at tid dot es 2005-03-13 15:05 --- (In reply to comment #2) I cannot reproduce it either with an obvious change to fix the missing Too bad. Sorry for reporting this in such an imprecise manner. The actual problem shows at Boost regression tests

[Bug c++/20453] GCC fails to treat a valid constant expression as a template argument

2005-03-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-13 15:09 --- (In reply to comment #3) (In reply to comment #2) I cannot reproduce it either with an obvious change to fix the missing Too bad. Sorry for reporting this in such an imprecise manner. The actual