--- Comment #13 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 02:55
---
Given the kind of solutions we're looking at, I can't imagine this being fixed
for 4.0, and probably not even for 4.1, so I've set this to P4.
However, it seems sad to me that we can't find some efficient way to
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20681
--- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-17 00:41
---
Why is this marked as a C++ front-end bug? Isn't this a middle-end problem?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20681
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-17 00:45
---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] wrong control reaches warning with
switches
--- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-17 00:41
---
Why is this marked as a C++ front-end
--- Comment #11 from ian at airs dot com 2005-10-17 04:39 ---
For the record, this is the work-around in the C frontend:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-01/msg01452.html
A corresponding patch in the C++ frontend would be more complicated, in order
to continue to emit the
--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-17 04:46
---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] wrong control reaches warning with
switches
On Oct 17, 2005, at 12:39 AM, ian at airs dot com wrote:
Fixing this in the middle-end will require a version of
