https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21057
Graham Frye changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||graham.frye at hotmail dot com
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21057
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #3 from david dot kirkby at onetel dot net 2010-01-16 14:29
---
(In reply to comment #2)
Confirmed. However, this has really low priority: the C++ standard is not
a superset of the C99 standard, so a number of things new to C99 are not
part of C++, and this is one of
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-05-02 19:02
---
Confirmed. However, this has really low priority: the C++ standard is not
a superset of the C99 standard, so a number of things new to C99 are not
part of C++, and this is one of them. If you want to write
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-16
13:15 ---
I want to use the ISO C99 complex datatypes in c++ because they are faster
than the template
complex types from std++.
Why do you say that? Well maybe before 4.0.0 it was slower but only slightly.
--
