I noticed this when looking at compile time / memory usage of PR 8361 and I
noticed that OVERLOAD is
currently a link list and we only use about 2 of the fields in the tree which
seems like a waste for a full
tree. I started to change it to be a VEC but ran into problems as it looks
like we can be in the middle of
the linked list but I did not check for sure.
--
Summary: OVERLOAD should not be a linked list of trees
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: memory-hog, compile-time-hog
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22635
