[Bug c++/23046] [4.1 Regression] ICE in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:191

2005-11-08 Thread dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #21 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-08 21:09 --- Subject: Bug 23046 Author: dnovillo Date: Tue Nov 8 21:09:51 2005 New Revision: 106656 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=106656 Log: 2005-11-08 James A. Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug c++/23046] [4.1 Regression] ICE in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:191

2005-11-08 Thread dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #22 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-08 21:16 --- Fixed. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-11/msg00539.html -- dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/23046] [4.1 Regression] ICE in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:191

2005-10-30 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #20 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 04:15 --- This is a showstopper; ICE on simple, valid code. We need to resolve what approach (es) to use to fix this and get it done. -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug c++/23046] [4.1 Regression] ICE in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:191

2005-10-11 Thread phython at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #19 from phython at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-11 06:36 --- Created an attachment (id=9961) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9961action=view) vrp workaround There seems to be a combination of front-end and middle-end bugs that cause this. The attached

[Bug c++/23046] [4.1 Regression] ICE in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:191

2005-10-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #18 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-09 15:44 --- I think this was decided that this was a front-end bug. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added