--- Comment #19 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-27 17:18
---
Fixed in 4.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Statu
--- Comment #18 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-27 17:18
---
Subject: Bug 23171
Author: mmitchel
Date: Tue Dec 27 17:18:05 2005
New Revision: 109081
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109081
Log:
PR c++/23171, c++/23172, c++/25417.
* c-d
--- Comment #17 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-27 06:09
---
Subject: Bug 23171
Author: mmitchel
Date: Tue Dec 27 06:09:13 2005
New Revision: 109075
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109075
Log:
PR c++/23171, c++/23172, c++/25417.
* c-d
--- Comment #16 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-24 09:41
---
We no longer get the ICE -- but gimplification does not honor TREE_STATIC on
the CONSTRUCTOR, so we get wrong code.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #15 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-24 08:56
---
Subject: Bug 23171
Author: mmitchel
Date: Sat Dec 24 08:56:10 2005
New Revision: 109036
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109036
Log:
PR c++/23171
* varasm.c (initializer_cons
--- Comment #14 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-24 08:51
---
Subject: Bug 23171
Author: mmitchel
Date: Sat Dec 24 08:51:05 2005
New Revision: 109035
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109035
Log:
PR c++/23171
* varasm.c (initializer_cons
--- Comment #13 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-23 23:40
---
I've finally figured out a tractable solution to this problem: just treat these
as dynamic initializations. That will be slightly less efficient than what the
C front end does, and result in a different initializ
