--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 05:54
---
Leaving as P2; we need to fix this or figure out why we can't.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24037
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 19:40 ---
Confirmed, because this was really a break out from another bug and I had
written this small testcase for that.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-14 00:13
---
Isn't this the same as PR 24009? And, I bet this isn't the new parser, but
rather the Austern/Weinberg patch to read all tokens up front.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24037
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-14 00:22 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Isn't this the same as PR 24009? And, I bet this isn't the new parser, but
rather the Austern/Weinberg patch to read all tokens up front.
Yes I am sure as we get in 3.4.0 and in 3.4.5
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24037
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-23
16:51 ---
This was caused by the new parser. The C front-end is not effected.
--
What|Removed |Added
