[Bug c++/25294] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Bogus unterminated comment error from #pragma comment

2005-12-31 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-31 23:46 --- Subject: Bug 25294 Author: jakub Date: Sat Dec 31 23:45:58 2005 New Revision: 109201 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=109201 Log: PR c++/25294 * directives.c (do_pragma): If pragma

[Bug c++/25294] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Bogus unterminated comment error from #pragma comment

2005-12-31 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-01 00:00 --- Subject: Bug 25294 Author: jakub Date: Sun Jan 1 00:00:56 2006 New Revision: 109202 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=109202 Log: PR c++/25294 * directives.c (do_pragma): If pragma

[Bug c++/25294] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Bogus unterminated comment error from #pragma comment

2005-12-31 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-01 00:10 --- Fixed with ugly hack in 4.1 and on the trunk, will be hopefully soon replaced with pragma handling merge from gomp-20050608-branch. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug c++/25294] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Bogus unterminated comment error from #pragma comment

2005-12-29 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org

[Bug c++/25294] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Bogus unterminated comment error from #pragma comment

2005-12-20 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-20 08:47 --- The problem is that directives.c:do_pragma says: /* Squirrel away the pragma text. Pragmas are newline-terminated. */ However, as this example shows, simply saving

[Bug c++/25294] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Bogus unterminated comment error from #pragma comment

2005-12-19 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-19 19:14 --- This needs fixing before release: P1. -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/25294] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Bogus unterminated comment error from #pragma comment

2005-12-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 13:00 --- The problem isn't present on gomp-20050608-branch (where pragma handling has been revamped). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25294

[Bug c++/25294] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Bogus unterminated comment error from #pragma comment

2005-12-11 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 03:09 --- : Search converges between 2004-09-20-161001-trunk (#551) and 2004-09-21-094824-trunk (#552). Looks like this was caused by: 2004-09-20 Matt Austern [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zack Weinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug c++/25294] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Bogus unterminated comment error from #pragma comment

2005-12-07 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-07 14:45 --- Confirmed a regression from 3.4.0. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/25294] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Bogus unterminated comment error from #pragma comment

2005-12-07 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-07 14:47 --- Another example which shows this is specific to the C++ front-end: struct f{ #pragma pack(1) /* Start comment end comment on next line */ }; int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { return 0; }