--- Comment #15 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-24 01:50 ---
Subject: Bug 26167
Author: manu
Date: Fri Nov 24 01:50:33 2006
New Revision: 119143
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119143
Log:
2006-11-24 Manuel Lopez-Ibanez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #16 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-24 01:56 ---
Fixed in mainline.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #14 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 15:37
---
*** Bug 26298 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from lopezibanez at gmail dot com 2006-09-18 08:16 ---
Yes, I hope to get it into 4.3. Nonetheless, if you wish to test it, I can add
the patch here.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26167
--- Comment #11 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-18 12:11
---
yes please. Actually I created my own patch for bringing the C++ frontend on
ear with the C frontend, but I didn't submit it because it produced bazillions
of (legal) warnings in the code I usually compile, too
--- Comment #12 from lopezibanez at gmail dot com 2006-09-18 12:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=12291)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12291action=view)
wcoercion patch r116922
Patch for trunk revision 116922 (bootstrapped and tested on i686-pc-linux-gnu).
--
--- Comment #13 from lopezibanez at gmail dot com 2006-09-18 12:45 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
yes please. Actually I created my own patch for bringing the C++ frontend on
ear with the C frontend, but I didn't submit it because it produced bazillions
of (legal) warnings in the code
--- Comment #7 from kristian dot hermansen at gmail dot com 2006-09-17
18:37 ---
Will gcc/g++ integrate the Wcoercion project's solution? It seems to have been
sponsored by Google's Summer of Code 2006. Maybe it will be tested/included
soon? Here is the developer: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #8 from kristian dot hermansen at gmail dot com 2006-09-17
18:39 ---
Sorry, I didn't notice at first that this was you!!! Will you integrate
Wcoercion into gcc/g++ soon or will it always remain a side project? It would
be nice to see such a warning come from using -Wall.
--- Comment #9 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-17 20:31 ---
It's aiming for inclusion in GCC 4.3, see
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GCC_4.3_Release_Planning
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26167
--- Comment #6 from lopezibanez at gmail dot com 2006-09-16 01:08 ---
In which way gcc reports the problem correctly? What gcc currently reports is
that if the prototype were missing the value would be passed as a signed int.
It is not warning you about the conversion, it warns you
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-21 05:41 ---
This should never have been in waiting.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from kristian dot hermansen at gmail dot com 2006-02-26
05:56 ---
Go ahead and tackle it. I'm not going to fix this myself...
--
Kristian Hermansen
--
kristian dot hermansen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-08 11:36 ---
Confirmed. The C frontend warns about this.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-08 14:46 ---
ugh, that warning isn't even in -Wextra.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26167
--- Comment #3 from gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2006-02-08 15:32
---
Subject: Re: -Wconversion fails to detect signedness conversion from int to
unsigned int in fuction call
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| ugh, that warning isn't even in -Wextra.
16 matches
Mail list logo
