[Bug c++/26660] [4.2 Regression] PCH vs -save-temps, ICE while GCing

2006-05-31 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-01 04:55 --- Subject: Bug 26660 Author: aoliva Date: Thu Jun 1 04:55:32 2006 New Revision: 114298 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114298 Log: PR c++/26660 * parser.c (cp_parser_initial_pragma): Read one

[Bug c++/26660] [4.2 Regression] PCH vs -save-temps, ICE while GCing

2006-05-28 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-28 06:47 --- Mine -- aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned

[Bug c++/26660] [4.2 Regression] PCH vs -save-temps, ICE while GCing

2006-05-28 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-28 06:49 --- Created an attachment (id=11522) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11522action=view) Patch that appears to fix the problem This patch, that I'm testing now, appears to fix the bug. And it even

[Bug c++/26660] [4.2 Regression] PCH vs -save-temps, ICE while GCing

2006-04-10 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-10 13:58 --- Confirmed. One can also use the following for t1.cc: = #include t.hh void foo() {} = -- reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

[Bug c++/26660] [4.2 Regression] PCH vs -save-temps, ICE while GCing

2006-04-01 Thread bsdfan3 at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #7 from bsdfan3 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2006-04-01 13:00 --- Still fails on mainline: $ mainline-gcc t1.cc -save-temps --param ggc-min-expand=0 --param ggc-min-heap size=0 t1.cc:5: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Please submit a full bug report, with

[Bug c++/26660] [4.2 Regression] PCH vs -save-temps, ICE while GCing

2006-04-01 Thread bsdfan3 at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #8 from bsdfan3 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2006-04-01 13:05 --- GCC 3.4.4 seems to compile the testcase fine though (sorry about the linker error, nobody specified -c on the build command line): [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ gcc t1.cc -save-temps --param ggc-min-expand=0

[Bug c++/26660] [4.2 Regression] PCH vs -save-temps, ICE while GCing

2006-03-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-13 22:32 --- This worked with 4.2.0 20060306 so it has to be a recent change. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/26660] [4.2 Regression] PCH vs -save-temps, ICE while GCing

2006-03-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-13 22:34 --- This is a blocker as I reduced it from a failing libstdc++ testcase. CCing the developers of the openmp patch since that is the only patch to the C++ front-end which could have caused this within the dates I gave.

[Bug c++/26660] [4.2 Regression] PCH vs -save-temps, ICE while GCing

2006-03-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-13 02:42 --- I am almost wanting to say this was caused by the openmp merge but I don't know for sure. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added