--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 20:15
---
Subject: Bug 26988
Author: mmitchel
Date: Sun Feb 11 20:15:13 2007
New Revision: 121822
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121822
Log:
PR c++/26988
* pt.c
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 21:41
---
Subject: Bug 26988
Author: mmitchel
Date: Sun Feb 11 21:40:56 2007
New Revision: 121826
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121826
Log:
PR c++/26988
* pt.c
--- Comment #5 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-03 16:45 ---
Won't fix in GCC-4.0.x Adjusting milestone.
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.1.3 |4.1.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26988
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-11 04:05
---
The problem here is that we are not skipping artificial arguments (other than
the this pointer) when trying to match the specialization. The additional
parameters for constructors for classes with virtual bases