[Bug c++/27768] [4.1/4.2 regression] wrong-code with vectors

2006-06-28 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-29 01:12 --- Subject: Bug 27768 Author: jason Date: Thu Jun 29 01:12:20 2006 New Revision: 115062 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115062 Log: PR c++/27768 * tree-ssa-alias.c (compute_flow_in

[Bug c++/27768] [4.1/4.2 regression] wrong-code with vectors

2006-06-28 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-28 19:12 --- Turns out to be a bug in alias grouping. Patch in testing. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27768

[Bug c++/27768] [4.1/4.2 regression] wrong-code with vectors

2006-06-26 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org

[Bug c++/27768] [4.1/4.2 regression] wrong-code with vectors

2006-06-14 Thread bangerth at dealii dot org
--- Comment #10 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2006-06-15 03:45 --- This problem persists with gcc4.1.x from 2006-06-13. I believe I get the same glibc fault in one of my codes, which isn't particularly surprising given that Volker used widely used std:: components in his program as wel

[Bug c++/27768] [4.1/4.2 regression] wrong-code with vectors

2006-06-04 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27768

[Bug c++/27768] [4.1/4.2 regression] wrong-code with vectors

2006-05-31 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-31 11:13 --- The modified testcase from comment #8 should return 0, but returns 255 (a.k.a -1) when compiled with -O2. The bad news is that this also affects the 4.1 branch (4.1.0 and later). The failure on the 4.1 branch is n