--- Comment #8 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 22:15 ---
Subject: Bug 28943
Author: manu
Date: Thu Feb 15 22:15:20 2007
New Revision: 122016
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=122016
Log:
2007-02-15 Manuel Lopez-Ibanez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #9 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 22:35 ---
Fixed in GCC 4.3
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-01-31 09:45 ---
Subject: Bug number PR28943
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg02582.html
--
--- Comment #1 from lindevel at gmx dot net 2006-09-03 19:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=12181)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12181action=view)
Testcase code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28943
--- Comment #2 from lindevel at gmx dot net 2006-09-03 19:36 ---
Created an attachment (id=12182)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12182action=view)
Preprocessed testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28943
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2006-09-03 19:41
---
Subject: Re: New: Unusable error message when using a
conditional-expression with multiple type arguments
On Sun, 2006-09-03 at 19:35 +, lindevel at gmx dot net wrote:
assert_testcase.cpp: In
--- Comment #4 from lindevel at gmx dot net 2006-09-03 20:08 ---
You proved ##c++ wrong! They bet that I would be ignored. ;)
The thing is that a void itself is not invalid. Using (expr ? void : void)
works as you see in my report.
In ##c++ I was told that ( x ? y : z ) wants both y
On Sun, 2006-09-03 at 20:08 +, lindevel at gmx dot net wrote:
--- Comment #4 from lindevel at gmx dot net 2006-09-03 20:08 ---
You proved ##c++ wrong! They bet that I would be ignored. ;)
The thing is that a void itself is not invalid. Using (expr ? void : void)
works as you
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2006-09-03 20:18
---
Subject: Re: Unusable error message when using a
conditional-expression with multiple type arguments
On Sun, 2006-09-03 at 20:08 +, lindevel at gmx dot net wrote:
--- Comment #4 from
--- Comment #6 from lindevel at gmx dot net 2006-09-03 20:38 ---
Perhaps the message should then be 0 (int) is of incompatible type to
debug(...) (void) or similar? At least it should be more clear about the fact
that the error is that both sides of the : need to be compatible (and are
10 matches
Mail list logo
