[Bug c++/29016] [4.2 Regression] tree check: expected class 'expression', have 'exceptional' (baselink) in get_base_var, at ipa-utils.c:224

2006-11-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-25 04:27 --- *** Bug 29658 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/29016] [4.2 Regression] tree check: expected class 'expression', have 'exceptional' (baselink) in get_base_var, at ipa-utils.c:224

2006-09-21 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-21 22:19 --- Subject: Bug 29016 Author: mmitchel Date: Thu Sep 21 22:18:54 2006 New Revision: 117123 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=117123 Log: PR c++/29016 * typeck.c (build_unary_op):

[Bug c++/29016] [4.2 Regression] tree check: expected class 'expression', have 'exceptional' (baselink) in get_base_var, at ipa-utils.c:224

2006-09-21 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-21 22:25 --- Fixed in 4.2.0. -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/29016] [4.2 Regression] tree check: expected class 'expression', have 'exceptional' (baselink) in get_base_var, at ipa-utils.c:224

2006-09-20 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com |dot org

[Bug c++/29016] [4.2 Regression] tree check: expected class 'expression', have 'exceptional' (baselink) in get_base_var, at ipa-utils.c:224

2006-09-19 Thread micis at gmx dot de
--- Comment #8 from micis at gmx dot de 2006-09-19 08:17 --- The patch in comment #5 fixes the testcases but a make bootstrap ; make check (with only C/C++) results in two new regressions: WARNING: program timed out. FAIL: g++.dg/opt/pr24665.C (test for excess errors) FAIL:

[Bug c++/29016] [4.2 Regression] tree check: expected class 'expression', have 'exceptional' (baselink) in get_base_var, at ipa-utils.c:224

2006-09-18 Thread tbm at cyrius dot com
--- Comment #6 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-18 13:50 --- Note that this bug is very frequent (compiling the Debian archive). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29016

[Bug c++/29016] [4.2 Regression] tree check: expected class 'expression', have 'exceptional' (baselink) in get_base_var, at ipa-utils.c:224

2006-09-18 Thread micis at gmx dot de
--- Comment #7 from micis at gmx dot de 2006-09-18 15:39 --- I get the same ICE with this short code: class A; class B { typedef void (*C[5]) (A *); static C D; static void E (A*) {} }; B::C B::D={E}; -- micis at gmx dot de changed: What|Removed

[Bug c++/29016] [4.2 Regression] tree check: expected class 'expression', have 'exceptional' (baselink) in get_base_var, at ipa-utils.c:224

2006-09-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-13 06:56 --- This one works for me but I doubt it is correct: Index: ../../gcc/ipa-utils.c === --- ../../gcc/ipa-utils.c (revision 116919) +++

[Bug c++/29016] [4.2 Regression] tree check: expected class 'expression', have 'exceptional' (baselink) in get_base_var, at ipa-utils.c:224

2006-09-11 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot |

[Bug c++/29016] [4.2 Regression] tree check: expected class 'expression', have 'exceptional' (baselink) in get_base_var, at ipa-utils.c:224

2006-09-11 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-11 15:29 --- This is why I mentioned BASELINK should be stripped. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29016

[Bug c++/29016] [4.2 Regression] tree check: expected class 'expression', have 'exceptional' (baselink) in get_base_var, at ipa-utils.c:224

2006-09-11 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29016