[Bug c++/30033] ICE on valid with --std=c++0x (static_assert)

2006-12-19 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-19 17:15 --- Subject: Bug 30033 Author: burnus Date: Tue Dec 19 17:14:22 2006 New Revision: 120053 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120053 Log: Merged revisions 119412-119459 via svnmerge from

[Bug c++/30033] ICE on valid with --std=c++0x (static_assert)

2006-12-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-02 16:59 --- Fixed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/30033] ICE on valid with --std=c++0x (static_assert)

2006-12-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-02 17:01 --- Subject: Bug 30033 Author: pinskia Date: Sat Dec 2 17:01:04 2006 New Revision: 119449 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119449 Log: 2006-12-02 Andrew Pinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug c++/30033] ICE on valid with --std=c++0x (static_assert)

2006-12-01 Thread pedro dot lamarao at mndfck dot org
--- Comment #5 from pedro dot lamarao at mndfck dot org 2006-12-01 11:37 --- Ah, just as I thought, but I was too sleepy to find about that function on my own. Must someone present this to gcc-patches or will you do it yourself? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30033

[Bug c++/30033] ICE on valid with --std=c++0x (static_assert)

2006-12-01 Thread pinskia at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-12-01 18:19 --- Subject: Re: ICE on valid with --std=c++0x (static_assert) On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 11:37 +, pedro dot lamarao at mndfck dot org wrote: Must someone present this to gcc-patches or will you do it yourself? I am going

[Bug c++/30033] ICE on valid with --std=c++0x (static_assert)

2006-11-30 Thread pedro dot lamarao at mndfck dot org
--- Comment #1 from pedro dot lamarao at mndfck dot org 2006-12-01 00:17 --- Created an attachment (id=12719) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12719action=view) Reduced test case that provokes ICE. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30033

[Bug c++/30033] ICE on valid with --std=c++0x (static_assert)

2006-11-30 Thread pedro dot lamarao at mndfck dot org
--- Comment #2 from pedro dot lamarao at mndfck dot org 2006-12-01 00:17 --- Created an attachment (id=12720) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12720action=view) Stack trace taken at breakpoint in tree.c:2171 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30033

[Bug c++/30033] ICE on valid with --std=c++0x (static_assert)

2006-11-30 Thread pedro dot lamarao at mndfck dot org
--- Comment #3 from pedro dot lamarao at mndfck dot org 2006-12-01 00:41 --- Created an attachment (id=12721) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12721action=view) Reduced test case that provokes ICE. -- pedro dot lamarao at mndfck dot org changed: What

[Bug c++/30033] ICE on valid with --std=c++0x (static_assert)

2006-11-30 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-01 04:10 --- Someone forgot to update cp_tree_node_structure :). Index: ../../gcc/cp/decl.c === --- ../../gcc/cp/decl.c (revision 119351) +++ ../../gcc/cp/decl.c