--- Comment #3 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2007-03-09 04:34 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
Take a look at this again:
struct A
{
operator short () { return m_value; }
operator short () const { return m_value; }
};
const A CONSTA(-1);
struct M {
--- Comment #2 from istvan at benedek-home dot de 2007-02-26 14:52 ---
?: is a lvalue in C++
Why? I'm missing the quotation from the Holy Standard!
IMHO:
we deal with two nonmodifiable lvalues here.
from HS 5.12 3:
Because E1 can't be converted to type 'reference to T2', the Section
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-22 23:37 ---
Hmm, ?: is a lvalue in C++. Since m_a is still an lvalue (a non modifiable one
though) we try to use operator short so we get the same type, const short,
on both sides of the : as short is a closer match to const
