https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33911
Louis Dionne changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ldionne.2 at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33911
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33911
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33911
Elias Pipping changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pipping at exherbo dot org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33911
--- Comment #17 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Nov 17 22:09:27 2014
New Revision: 217677
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217677root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/33911
gcc/cp/
* call.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33911
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Nov 12 10:32:17 2014
New Revision: 217412
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217412root=gccview=rev
Log:
Add -Wno-deprecated to dg-options.
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33911
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I've fixed most of the tests but I think the remaining ones reveal that the
warning is a bit too eager:
templatetypename T
struct B
{
B(T t) { }
} __attribute__
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33911
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The comment below is from Richard Smith. I don't think we do have the same
problem for abi_tag, so Jason must have solved this problem there.
I was amazed to discover
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33911
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Also, even after the template definition (and the attribute) have been
instantiated, typedefs for the instantiation don't get a warning unless the
typedef itself is also marked
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33911
--- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 33938
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33938action=edit
patch
Here's a compiler patch. Jonathan, can you decide what to do with the library
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33911
--- Comment #11 from eraman at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: eraman
Date: Thu Oct 3 17:39:35 2013
New Revision: 203174
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203174root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-10-03 Easwaran Raman era...@google.com
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33911
Easwaran Raman eraman at google dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eraman at google
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33911
--- Comment #7 from Victor Gaydov victor at enise dot org 2012-12-02 08:16:04
UTC ---
I also have experienced bug 7.
I'm porting a project that uses std::auto_ptr in several places to c++11.
However, there are no deprecated warnings
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33911
--- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-12-02
09:56:41 UTC ---
Personally, I'm not aware of any wa, if somebody finds one, please add it here,
thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33911
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-02
12:38:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Not planning to work on this soon since there's a reasonable workaround.
Jason, that workaround is only for function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33911
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
--- Comment #5 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-05 23:08 ---
Not planning to work on this soon since there's a reasonable workaround.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-28 03:17 ---
*** Bug 36307 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--- Comment #3 from jason at redhat dot com 2008-01-04 22:23 ---
Subject: Re: attribute deprecated vs. templates
niemayer at isg dot de wrote:
I can second that problem for template member functions - in contrast to
non-template member functions, where the attribute works.
This is
--- Comment #2 from niemayer at isg dot de 2007-12-20 14:32 ---
I can second that problem for template member functions - in contrast to
non-template member functions, where the attribute works.
This gives a warning about deprecation as expected:
--- Comment #1 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-10-26 16:08 ---
*** Bug 33912 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33911
22 matches
Mail list logo
