--- Comment #22 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-20 04:48 ---
Subject: Bug 34774
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 20 04:47:28 2008
New Revision: 132469
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132469
Log:
PR c++/34950
* pt.c (resolve_overloaded_unificat
--- Comment #21 from tbptbp at gmail dot com 2008-02-14 07:52 ---
I've already submitted PR34864 for the folding but apparently i've overdone the
reduction; it's actually slightly tricky to trigger the issue (i mean i've
obviously hit another problem in that PR).
Right now i'm out of in
--- Comment #20 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-13 19:30 ---
Please submit a separate bug report for the folding issue, with a reduced
testcase if possible.
Incidentally, the "no integral type can represent" issue is due to one of the
enumerators being -31, and one being (unsi
--- Comment #19 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-13 18:44 ---
Subject: Bug 34774
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 13 18:43:34 2008
New Revision: 132292
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132292
Log:
PR c++/34774
* pt.c (value_dependent_expression_
--- Comment #18 from tbptbp at gmail dot com 2008-02-13 17:21 ---
Ah ah!
[svn pull... build...]
Sadly it makes no difference yet, most certainly because of all the kludges i
had to stuff in: out of the 2213 tests (from the ucb-corpus for +,-,*,/,sqrt)
there's still 3 of them (all additio
