--- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-06 20:14 ---
The testcase in comment #2 is ill-formed;
templatevoid foo(Sdouble, Sdouble*);
is not a specialization of any function template in scope. But we're giving
very much the wrong error for
--- Comment #9 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-06 20:29 ---
...and GCC miscompiles the original testcase due to the same bug.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-06 20:55 ---
Subject: Bug 35146
Author: jason
Date: Mon Apr 6 20:55:04 2009
New Revision: 145625
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=145625
Log:
PR c++/35146
* pt.c (fn_type_unification): For
--- Comment #11 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-06 21:35 ---
Subject: Bug 35146
Author: jason
Date: Mon Apr 6 21:35:29 2009
New Revision: 145634
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=145634
Log:
PR c++/35146
* pt.c (fn_type_unification): For
--- Comment #12 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-07 03:51 ---
Subject: Bug 35146
Author: jason
Date: Tue Apr 7 03:50:49 2009
New Revision: 145647
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=145647
Log:
PR c++/35146
* pt.c (fn_type_unification): For
--- Comment #13 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-07 04:46 ---
Fixed.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-31 15:10 ---
Closing 4.2 branch, original test fixed in 4.3. However, there's a note here
about the test in comment#2 being valid and failing on trunk as of a year
ago, and that test does still fail, so marking as a 4.3/4.4/4.5
