--- Comment #25 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-24 10:28 ---
This bug was fixed for 4.4 version. The real issue here was the changes happend
to ira and specifying one register via the constrains =a or +a. Both
variant don't work anymore. By expanding the stack_allocator
--- Comment #24 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-20 11:24 ---
This bug is reasoned by some problems in ira. IIUC, mingw 32-bit has the same
issue here.
This bug can be worked around by disable ira optimization via -fno-ira.
--
--- Comment #22 from pepalogik at seznam dot cz 2008-09-21 15:02 ---
I'm probably not the one who'll find the core of the bug but I'd like to
mention two simple facts:
1: mingw-w64-bin_i686-mingw_20080707 WORKS
2: mingw-w64-bin_x86_64-mingw_20080724 DOESN'T WORK
(Vista64 SP1)
I don't
--- Comment #23 from nightstrike at gmail dot com 2008-09-21 17:06 ---
(In reply to comment #22)
I'm probably not the one who'll find the core of the bug but I'd like to
mention two simple facts:
Thanks for your feedback!
1: mingw-w64-bin_i686-mingw_20080707 WORKS
2:
--- Comment #21 from nightstrike at gmail dot com 2008-05-13 13:23 ---
ping.. Is there anyone that can help us with this?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35159
--- Comment #20 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-08 06:06
---
This looks like bad stuff. See my separate note to see if I can get to a point
of reproducing this.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35159
--- Comment #19 from nightstrike at gmail dot com 2008-03-06 16:08 ---
Ok, compiling the aforementioned Hello, world! program using gfortran
--save-temps hello.f90 results in f951.exe maxing out the CPU forever.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35159
--- Comment #16 from nightstrike at gmail dot com 2008-03-06 03:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=15267)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15267action=view)
Preprocssed source for the testcase mentioned
I took the code that I mentioned in the first post in this bug and
--- Comment #17 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-06 04:50
---
What is the Fortran test case that makes this is a gfortran issue?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35159
--- Comment #18 from nightstrike at gmail dot com 2008-03-06 05:09 ---
(In reply to comment #17)
What is the Fortran test case that makes this is a gfortran issue?
PROGRAM HelloWorld
WRITE(*,*) Hello World!
END PROGRAM
I haven't tested that again with the latest changes that
--- Comment #14 from nightstrike at gmail dot com 2008-02-16 17:22 ---
edited title to reflect gfortran failure, as well.
--
nightstrike at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #15 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-16 19:50 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
(In reply to comment #8)
I tested this already and it didn't solved the problem. But may +a is more
correct.
Perhaps setting RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P is needed? Or gen_blockage() at some
12 matches
Mail list logo
