--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-22 09:41 ---
Even the extra error in nontype16.C is IMHO wrong.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35282
--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-22 09:51 ---
For 4.3, guess ice-on-invalid is more acceptable than rejects-valid, unless we
have a real fix RSN, though I'll let Jason/Mark to decide.
We have everything else what I was waiting for on gcc-4_3-branch, so if we can
--- Comment #4 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2008-02-22 09:48 ---
Ok, I'm going to post a patch reverting completely the fix for 28743, and then
we'll see...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35282
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-22 10:44 ---
IMHO reverting the fix for PR28743 is the way to go (Paolo, you don't need
approval for reverting a patch of your own).
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-22 11:02 ---
Subject: Bug 35282
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Feb 22 11:02:00 2008
New Revision: 132543
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=132543
Log:
/testsuite
2008-02-22 Paolo Carlini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #8 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-22 11:03 ---
Subject: Bug 35282
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Feb 22 11:02:31 2008
New Revision: 132544
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=132544
Log:
/testsuite
2008-02-22 Paolo Carlini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #9 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-22 11:04 ---
Subject: Bug 35282
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Feb 22 11:03:17 2008
New Revision: 132545
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=132545
Log:
/testsuite
2008-02-22 Paolo Carlini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #10 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2008-02-22 11:05 ---
Fixed.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35282
--- Comment #1 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2008-02-21 22:25 ---
Please double check, but I don't think it's my patch: I tried quickly reverting
it and interestingly nothing changes: 28743 doesn't ICE and this one is
rejected. It seems something new is going on in this area... Maybe
--- Comment #2 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2008-02-21 23:13 ---
Never mind, I did something wrong in my quick check. I can confirm it's my
patch. I'll try to look a bit into it, but beyond reverting it, I cannot
promise to be able to fix the present issue without regressing on 28743...
11 matches
Mail list logo
