--- Comment #15 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2009-03-27 07:16 ---
Approved here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg01079.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35652
--- Comment #14 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-08 15:46 ---
Patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-02/msg00285.html
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #13 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2009-02-03 16:40 ---
I agree that the patch is correct *without* the -1, so... ping :)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35652
--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de 2008-11-02 12:20 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] offset warning should
be given in the front-end
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008, manu at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #8 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-01 17:44
--- Comment #10 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-02 12:53 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
This is my current patch and it works in this testcase. However, it also
triggers on cases like: const char *p = str + sizeof(str)
Perhaps I am doing this at the wrong place. Any
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-02 13:02
---
I'm not sure. Does TREE_STRING_LENGTH in the particular case include the
NULL character? Does sizeof(str) include the NULL character?
In principle it is allowed to have a pointer point one after the last
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 2, 2008, at 4:53 AM, manu at gcc dot gnu dot org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Comment #10 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-02
12:53 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
This is my current patch and it works in this testcase. However,
it also
--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-11-02 13:07 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] offset warning should be given in the
front-end
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 2, 2008, at 4:53 AM, manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Comment #10
--- Comment #8 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-01 17:44 ---
This is my current patch and it works in this testcase. However, it also
triggers on cases like: const char *p = str + sizeof(str)
Perhaps I am doing this at the wrong place. Any suggestions?
@@ -3322,10 +3323,36 @@
--- Comment #7 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-30 22:44 ---
The location info seems to be fixed in mainline. Nonetheless, I agree
completely with Richard. This warning belongs in the front-end. Moreover we
fail to diagnose:
const char *s = 'x' + y;
in both C and C++. Also,
10 matches
Mail list logo
