[Bug c++/35758] vector_size attribute lost in function arguments for templates

2017-08-03 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35758 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/35758] vector_size attribute lost in function arguments for templates

2015-12-22 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35758 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug c++/35758] vector_size attribute lost in function arguments for templates

2008-11-14 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #22 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-14 16:38 --- Downgrading priority/severity since this is no longer a regression. -- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/35758] vector_size attribute lost in function arguments for templates

2008-07-04 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #21 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-04 19:42 --- Comment says no regression, removing milestone. -- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/35758] vector_size attribute lost in function arguments for templates

2008-04-24 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #19 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-24 18:48 --- With the changes checked in, I believe there is no regression anymore, but using vector_size, altivec or spu_vector attributes on template parameters will still do bad and unexpected things. -- jakub at gcc dot