--- Comment #10 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-20 18:47 ---
Subject: Bug 36921
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Dec 20 18:46:12 2008
New Revision: 142849
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=142849
Log:
PR c++/36921
* c-common.c
--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-03 17:47
---
I'm not convinced that we shouldn't warn in these cases. Yes, there are cases
where people overload the operators in ways that make normal precedence
irrelevant. But, there are also cases where people define
--- Comment #9 from deba at inf dot elte dot hu 2008-12-03 19:26 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
I'm not convinced that we shouldn't warn in these cases. Yes, there are cases
where people overload the operators in ways that make normal precedence
irrelevant. But, there are also cases
--- Comment #7 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-25 14:53 ---
Patch and update summary.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
