https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38764
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #6 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38764
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steffen at sdaoden dot eu
--- Comment
--- Comment #4 from pluto at agmk dot net 2009-01-09 19:39 ---
as mentioned, gcc is correct.
--
pluto at agmk dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-08 12:50 ---
I suggest filing a problem report with Comeau. EDG accepts both in
-strict_ansi mode.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38764
--- Comment #2 from pluto at agmk dot net 2009-01-08 12:56 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
I suggest filing a problem report with Comeau. EDG accepts both in
-strict_ansi mode.
i've tested it on comeau online to verify g++ behaviour :)
--
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-08 19:16 ---
Subject: Re: New: bogus 'changes meaning' error?
On Jan 8, 2009, at 4:22 AM, pluto at agmk dot net gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
following code snipet is reducted testcase from external application.
g++ and