--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-17 15:41 ---
Fixed for 4.5.0.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #6 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-17 06:12 ---
Subject: Bug 3
Author: jason
Date: Sat Oct 17 06:11:21 2009
New Revision: 152925
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=152925
Log:
PR c++/3
* error.c (dump_template_bindings):
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3
--- Comment #5 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-01-30 15:29 ---
I think Jason confirmed this already...
--
bangerth at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-16 22:50 ---
Yep, I've been making a bunch of mangling changes recently. Should be all done
now though.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-16 22:46 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> We demangle it as int X::f()
I have to update my c++filt even though it is from August 2008.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3
--- Comment #2 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-16 22:45 ---
We demangle it as int X::f()
The suggestion seems reasonable to me.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-16 22:38 ---
Well the diagnostic mechanism does not demangle anything, we have the whole
expression in memory still. So changing the diagnostic is no issue. Now I
wonder how we (c++filt) demange "_ZN1XIIidEE1fIIidEEEiv" anyways
