--- Comment #12 from cppljevans at suddenlink dot net 2009-08-16 13:44
---
Created an attachment (id=18375)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18375action=view)
compare of `make -k check-c++` before and after patch
The attached .zip file contains the diffs between
--- Comment #13 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-08-16 15:45
---
(In reply to comment #12)
Does anything else need to be done before the patch is accepted?
Yes, patch + testcase must be sent to the gcc-patches mailing list. If the
changes are not trivial, of course you
--- Comment #11 from cppljevans at suddenlink dot net 2009-08-15 15:44
---
Created an attachment (id=18371)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18371action=view)
test case for gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x with gcc-4.5 compile
This is even a more minimal test case. This
--- Comment #10 from cppljevans at suddenlink dot net 2009-08-13 19:15
---
Created an attachment (id=18356)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18356action=view)
minimal test case demonstrating bug
The comments at bottom show that wrong template instance is being
--- Comment #9 from cppljevans at suddenlink dot net 2009-08-12 19:15
---
As indicated here:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gcc.bugs/254672
the problem occurs because an additional test is needed
in cp_tree_equal.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40092
--- Comment #8 from cppljevans at suddenlink dot net 2009-08-03 12:08
---
Created an attachment (id=18288)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18288action=view)
Shows Value_0 fail but Value_1 pass
Since Value_0 and Value_1 only differ in argument number, hopefully
this
--- Comment #6 from cppljevans at suddenlink dot net 2009-07-13 12:48
---
Created an attachment (id=18184)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18184action=view)
Similar but simpler source (no Tail... in impl_front specialization)
Same error message, but no Tail... in
--- Comment #7 from cppljevans at suddenlink dot net 2009-07-13 12:50
---
Created an attachment (id=18185)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18185action=view)
compilation using gcc-4.5-20090702
Compiler source from:
--- Comment #5 from cppljevans at suddenlink dot net 2009-06-11 21:24
---
Created an attachment (id=17984)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17984action=view)
another version of earlier attach with a little different code but similar
error msg
This version shows a
On 05/14/09 20:19, cppljevans at suddenlink dot net wrote:
--- Comment #4 from cppljevans at suddenlink dot net 2009-05-15 01:19
---
Created an attachment (id=17869)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17869action=view)
Much simpler code showing problem
Code has
--- Comment #4 from cppljevans at suddenlink dot net 2009-05-15 01:19
---
Created an attachment (id=17869)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17869action=view)
Much simpler code showing problem
Code has #defines which can be enabled or disabled to
show or hide bug.
--- Comment #3 from cppljevans at suddenlink dot net 2009-05-10 16:24
---
Created an attachment (id=17846)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17846action=view)
system type
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40092
--- Comment #2 from cppljevans at suddenlink dot net 2009-05-10 16:22
---
Created an attachment (id=17845)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17845action=view)
compilation output
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40092
--- Comment #1 from cppljevans at suddenlink dot net 2009-05-10 16:22
---
Created an attachment (id=17844)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17844action=view)
The .ii file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40092
14 matches
Mail list logo
