--- Comment #4 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-12-26 13:57
---
Works fine in mainline indeed.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-19 00:19 ---
pair(pair) is in the WP now.
4.5 gives no errors for the testcase, which I believe is correct; it's OK to
bind an rvalue to a const lvalue reference.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #2 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2009-06-15 12:06
---
8.3.5p5? is that reference right?
and I assume you mean line 10, not line 14.
The pair(pair) constructor is not in the WP. Commenting it out causes the
pair(pairU,V) constructor to be used, which fails to
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
Summary|g++ does not obey 8.3.5p5?! |[C++0x] g++
