http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40793
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40793
--- Comment #14 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-09-29
10:45:40 UTC ---
Never mind, I don't think it's the same, but 39813 is also pretty weird, why
error.c sees the member template as a friend it's a mystery to me...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40793
--- Comment #15 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-29
12:13:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
Never mind, I don't think it's the same, but 39813 is also pretty weird, why
error.c sees the member template as a friend
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40793
--- Comment #16 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-09-29
12:20:51 UTC ---
Thanks. Now in mainline we say this:
40793.C: In function ‘void f()’:
40793.C:5:31: error: no matching function for call to ‘staticPrint()’
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40793
--- Comment #17 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-29
14:35:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
Thanks. Now in mainline we say this:
40793.C: In function ‘void f()’:
40793.C:5:31: error: no matching function for call
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40793
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40793
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Schmidt-Dominé jonathan.sd24 at yahoo dot de
2011-03-23 16:29:31 UTC ---
Couldn't this patch be accepted? It looks very nice…
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40793
--- Comment #12 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-23
17:17:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
Couldn't this patch be accepted? It looks very nice…
Unfortunately, I don't have enough free time to test this patch and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40793
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-30
23:52:05 UTC ---
So with the example in comment #5, we get:
t.cc: In function ‘void f()’:
t.cc:5:31: error: no matching function for call to ‘staticPrint()’
t.cc:2:18: note:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40793
--- Comment #10 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-01
00:13:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
So with the example in comment #5, we get:
t.cc: In function ‘void f()’:
t.cc:5:31: error: no matching function for call to
--- Comment #6 from m-matti-a dot lehtonen at iki dot fi 2010-07-01 08:58
---
I have spend recently many, Many hours with heavily template based code (using
CGAL - http://www.cgal.org/) until I figured, why my code failed.
Telling input types and candidate list of all mismatched
--- Comment #7 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-01 21:31 ---
With the patch below, we print this:
pr40793.C:5:31: error: no matching function for call to staticPrintdouble,
text()
pr40793.C:2:18: note: candidate is: templateclass T, T t void staticPrint()
but I am not sure
--- Comment #8 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2010-07-01 21:38 ---
I think that would already be an improvement.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40793
--- Comment #5 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-08-25 14:25 ---
Jonathan, the point everyone is trying to make is this: since no function
or function template matches the call, all the compiler could possibly
do is list all declarations of the name staticPrint() or none, but of
--- Comment #4 from jonathan dot sd24 at yahoo dot de 2009-07-29 21:05
---
Template-Parameters can be results of long calculations or typedefs with
several layers of indirection.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40793
--- Comment #3 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2009-07-21 17:45
---
It tells you the location of the call. If you've specified the template
arguments at that location then you can see what they are, I don't see how
putting them in the diagnostic will save hours if you could find
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-18 08:59 ---
But it doens't know it looks for a template function. It should display the
candidate list from which you can see what happens.
This is how name-lookup and overload resolution works...
--
rguenth at gcc dot
--- Comment #2 from jonathan dot sd24 at yahoo dot de 2009-07-18 10:02
---
When I explicitly specify the template-arguments g++ should know it.
And there was no candidate-list.
For example:
templatetypename T, T t
void staticPrint()
{
cout t endl;
}
Now I call:
staticPrintdouble,
18 matches
Mail list logo
