--- Comment #14 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-30 16:05 ---
Subject: Bug 41020
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Oct 30 16:04:41 2009
New Revision: 153759
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=153759
Log:
2009-10-30 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com
Backport from
--- Comment #13 from law at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-29 16:50 ---
Subject: Bug 41020
Author: law
Date: Thu Oct 29 16:48:00 2009
New Revision: 153715
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=153715
Log:
Recorded merge of revisions
--- Comment #12 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-27 10:29 ---
Subject: Bug 41020
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Oct 27 10:28:48 2009
New Revision: 153587
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=153587
Log:
PR c++/41020
* g++.dg/lookup/extern-c-redecl5.C:
--- Comment #10 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-26 14:40 ---
Subject: Bug 41020
Author: dodji
Date: Mon Oct 26 14:40:16 2009
New Revision: 153552
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=153552
Log:
Fix PR c++/41020
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c++/41020
--- Comment #11 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-26 16:06 ---
Fixed in 4.5.0
--
dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Indeed. I am testing the patch below.
diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.c b/gcc/cp/decl.c
index 5eb389f..7c01ee2 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/decl.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/decl.c
@@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ static void store_parm_decls (tree);
static void initialize_local_var (tree, tree);
static void expand_static_init (tree,
--- Comment #8 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-23 18:19 ---
Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] Can't declare an extern C
friend of a builtin function
Indeed. I am testing the patch below.
diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.c b/gcc/cp/decl.c
index 5eb389f..7c01ee2 100644
---
--
dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #9 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-23 19:32 ---
Subject: Re: New: Can't declare an extern C friend.
Patch submitted to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-10/msg01486.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41020
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-04 19:13 ---
This is related to builtins too because either using -fno-builtin or using
fork1 allows this program to work.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41020
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Summary|Can't declare an extern C |[4.5
--- Comment #3 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-10 16:17 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Apart from the semi-colon after the extern C block the code is valid and
this
is a recent regression on trunk.
I am fairly sure that a semi-colon after a block statement like that is
--- Comment #4 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2009-08-10 17:05
---
It's irrelevant to this bug and is just me being more pedantic than -pedantic,
however ... even with -pedantic GCC has always accepted stray semi-colons at
namespace scope, but it's not valid.
At function scope
--- Comment #5 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-10 17:16 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
It's irrelevant to this bug and is just me being more pedantic than -pedantic,
however ... even with -pedantic GCC has always accepted stray semi-colons at
namespace scope, but it's not
15 matches
Mail list logo
