--- Comment #5 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-31 21:21 ---
Fixed.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-31 21:20 ---
Subject: Bug 41127
Author: jason
Date: Mon Aug 31 21:20:07 2009
New Revision: 151247
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151247
Log:
PR c++/41127
* parser.c (cp_parser_enum_specifier
--- Comment #3 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-31 21:08 ---
Subject: Bug 41127
Author: jason
Date: Mon Aug 31 21:08:33 2009
New Revision: 151246
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151246
Log:
PR c++/41127
* parser.c (cp_parser_enum_specifier
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-31 16:33 ---
Yeah, I'm afraid we can't parse definitely when we see : after enum identifier,
if : isn't followed by type-specifier-seq, we should return NULL.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41127
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41127
--- Comment #1 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-08-25 13:43 ---
This is an interesting one:
enum EE {ee};
struct D {
enum EE : 8;
};
In C++98, this looks like an unnamed bit field as part of struct D, but
with C++0x we apparent
